Archive for October 12, 2009

The President Who Told The TRUTH

Posted in 9/11, Alex Jones, Attack on Freedom, False Flag Terror, International Bankers, New World Order, Police State/Martial Law, Secret Societies, Shadow Government, the 9/11 Files, The Constitution, The Federal Reserve, Tyranny, Unconstitutional with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on October 12, 2009 by truthwillrise

This vid contains one of the most awesome, inspiring and truthful speeches ever given by a president. This very speech must have caused a lot of panic among the higher echelons of the elite. Kennedy had been in office for only 3 months and he was already taking unprecedented steps to empower ordinary people. Kennedy did more for civil rights than any other president since Abraham Lincoln. Kennedy was a big supporter of the constitution, he was against the tyranny of big government. He wanted to withdraw US troops from Vietnam. He wanted to abolish the CIA and Federal Reserve, and he warned us of criminal elements within the establishment who wanted to cease an opportunity to restrict peoples freedoms. He urged the press to be more open and to fulfill its obligation to inform the American people about pertinent facts. And on top of that he spoke openly and candidly about the dangers of secret societies and their influence over the way government works. So is it any wonder that he was dramatically silenced only two years after making this epic speech?

You can hear the full “President And The Press” speech using the Google Video link below:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?doc…

And here is a transcript of the speech:
http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+…

For this video I have included the main parts of JFK’s speech, where he warns us about the dangers of secret societies.

It seems that Kennedy wanted to blow the whistle when he found out about the true scale of corruption within the establishment and how freemasonry and other secret societies play an integral part in this corrupt agenda. It also seems that Kennedy wanted to speak out about the closed and secretive nature of organisations like the freemasons, especially at the higher levels. And it is only when a freemason reaches the higher levels that he can gain a fuller understanding of the kind of organisation he is part of. Freemasonry also has its own set of rules, oaths, allegiances and rituals that are considered higher in importance than the ordinary code of conduct that we ordinary people live by. And the higher up you go in freemasonry, the more strange and daring the initiation rituals become; this is a hallmark of the way criminal gangs operate. Remember, just because someone wears a suit and a tie, that doesnt necessarily make them a better person than the mugger in the alley with the baseball bat.

I find it very curious that some people compare Obama with Kennedy, as if they are both one and the same. But you only have to look at the people that Obama has recruited to work alongside him to realise where he’s coming from. Employing Zbigniew Brzezinski as his Chief Foreign Policy advisor is just one example. Then on top of that, Obama admits to being a globalist and he has publically admitted to attending a CFR meeting where he gave a speech. But what makes me feel most uncomfortable is the way that Obama stuttered and lied about the significance of his speech at the CFR. When question about his CFR involvement, Obama said: “I dont know if I’m an official member.” – He wants us to believe that the CFR would allow someone to attend their meeting and give a speech, and yet not even discuss the issue of membership. You’re either a member of something or you’re not, so the word “official” is an irrelevant filler word. If he doesn’t know that he’s a member then that could only mean that he is not a member – in which case, why didn’t he just say: “I am not a member, although I did speak there once?” Why not just be open and honest about it instead of stuttering and lying in an attempt to downplay the significance of it?

JFK’s assassination was probably executed by CIA resources developed in the anti-Castro campaign that Kennedy was cancelling, and redirected against the internal threat, Kennedy. The investigation which followed the assassination was overseen and directed by Freemasons, who could influence the selection of the rest of the investigative team and effectively control the results.

The JFK assassination appears to have been part a campaign of assassinations against a generation of leaders who posed challenges to the entrenched power structure. The death toll included John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X. Viewed as a whole, one is driven to the conclusion that anyone advocating or supporting serious social reforms will not be tolerated in a leadership position.

California Swine Flu Checkpoint Identified?

Posted in Attack on Freedom, New World Order, News, Paul Watson, Police State/Martial Law, Stupid Government Tricks with tags , , , on October 12, 2009 by truthwillrise

Man claims armed military personnel at roadblock forced people to enter mobile trailers

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, September 28, 2009

The testimony of a woman who claimed she was part of a military drill in California centered around setting up roadblocks to check if people had received the H1N1 vaccine has potentially been validated with another report of a swine flu checkpoint near San Diego.

Earlier this month we reported on the You Tube video of a woman who claimed to have taken part in an Army exercise which involved setting up roadblocks and checkpoints so authorities could check who has received the swine flu vaccine. Those who have had the shots will be fitted with an RFID bracelet so they can be tracked. Those who have not taken the shot will be offered it there and then and if they still refuse, will be carted off to an internment camp, according to the woman.

Former Kansas state trooper Greg Evensen spoke of similar checkpoints recently, when he told an audience in West Virginia that preparations to enforce mandated vaccinations were being focused around preventing those who haven’t had the shot from traveling.

“I have been told by state troopers across the country that there are plans ready to be implemented that would include roadblocks and choke points as we call them, major interstate junctions around major cities and so forth where the greatest number of people can be held until they prove their vaccination by papers,” Evenson said, adding that permanent RFID bracelets would then be used to identify those who had taken the shot.

“I have been told that the plans would include buses standing by for people at roadblocks that refuse to take the inoculation,” added Evenson, saying that such refusniks would then be taken to military bases and imprisoned.

“Get your shot or get on the bus, that’s what’s coming,” warned Evenson.

Authorities in Boston have already trialed RFID bracelet technology, with the purpose of creating a “vaccination map” charting which people have taken the vaccine and which have not, or “creating a citywide registry of everyone who has had a flu vaccination,” as a Boston Globe article describes.

Participants were given a bracelet with a unique identifier code, exactly as described in the You Tube clip of the woman’s testimony.

We have now received yet another report of a roadblock staffed by armed military personnel centered around checking whether people have received vaccines.

A reader e mailed us a photo (see top of page) and the testimony of his friend who was traveling from California to Arizona after visiting friends. The man was driving through mountains east of San Diego when he came across a roadblock.

“As I neared the border they had a checkpoint set up but not the usual stateline checkpoint,” he writes.

“As I approached I noticed armed military personnel had most of the cars pulled over and there were a lot of people going in and out of a mobile trailer. The people looked confused and some upset. Seeing what was going on made me really nervous,” the man adds.

He was then approached by a women in military fatigues who asked him where he was driving and “something about a vaccination.”

“I got scared and told her I was a state geologist doing field research and because I was doing so much driving back and forth I had my vaccine on campus. She didn’t say anything for a few seconds and then the car behind me started honking and she got pissed and waved me on. I was so scared!,” he concludes.

The truck with the green stripe seen in the image is undoubtedly a border patrol car, but a blow up of the picture shows men dressed in military cammo, not the usual single color green uniform of border patrol agents. One of the men on the left hand side of the car in front appears to be carrying a large firearm.

Whether this was just another of the sprawling internal checkpoints that are now popping up all over the country is open to debate, but the fact that vaccines were mentioned indicates that this was potentially another drill in preparation for a mass swine flu outbreak. The addition of mobile trailers and unhappy people being forced to leave their cars and undergo some form of involuntary procedure hints that this could have been something even more ominous. See the enlarged image below.

G-20: Luke Interrupts NBC’s Brian Williams and faces criticism

Posted in Attack on Freedom, New World Order, News, Police State/Martial Law, Stupid Government Tricks with tags , , , on October 12, 2009 by truthwillrise

9/11 Blogger

September 28,2009

<embed wmode=”opaque” src=”http://static.ning.com/socialnetworkmain/widgets/video/flvplayer/flvplayer.swf?v=4.13.1%3A73311a8” FlashVars=”config=http%3A%2F%2Fsnardfarker.ning.com%2Fvideo%2Fvideo%2FshowPlayerConfig%3Fid%3D2649739%253AVideo%253A106508%26ck%3D-&amp;video_smoothing=on&amp;autoplay=off&amp;isEmbedCode=1″ width=”456″ height=”344″ bgColor=”#000000″ scale=”noscale” allowScriptAccess=”always” allowFullScreen=”true” type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” pluginspage=”http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer“> </embed> <br /><small><a href=”http://snardfarker.ning.com/video/video”>Find more videos like this on <em>12.160Mhz </em></a></small><br />

Warmonger Wins Peace Prize

Posted in Attack on Freedom, International Bankers, New World Order, News, Police State/Martial Law, Secret Societies, Shadow Government, Stupid Government Tricks, Truth/Freedom, Tyranny, Unconstitutional with tags , , , on October 12, 2009 by truthwillrise

Paul Craig Roberts
Infowars
October 10, 2009

It took 25 years longer than George Orwell thought for the slogans of 1984 to become reality.

“War is Peace,” “Freedom is Slavery,” “Ignorance is Strength.”

featured stories   Warmonger Wins Peace Prize

featured stories   Warmonger Wins Peace Prize

I would add, “Lie is Truth.”

The Nobel Committee has awarded the 2009 Peace Prize to President Obama, the person who started a new war in Pakistan, upped the war in Afghanistan, and continues to threaten Iran with attack unless Iran does what the US government demands and relinquishes its rights as a signatory to the non-proliferation treaty.

The Nobel committee chairman, Thorbjoern Jagland said, “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.”

Obama, the committee gushed, has created “a new climate in international politics.”

Tell that to the 2 million displaced Pakistanis and the unknown numbers of dead ones that Obama has racked up in his few months in office. Tell that to the Afghans where civilian deaths continue to mount as Obama’s “war of necessity” drones on indeterminably.

No Bush policy has changed. Iraq is still occupied. The Guantanamo torture prison is still functioning. Rendition and assassinations are still occurring. Spying on Americans without warrants is still the order of the day. Civil liberties are continuing to be violated in the name of Oceania’s “war on terror.”

Apparently, the Nobel committee is suffering from the delusion that, being a minority, Obama is going to put a stop to Western hegemony over darker-skinned peoples.

The non-cynical can say that the Nobel committee is seizing on Obama’s rhetoric to lock him into the pursuit of peace instead of war. We can all hope that it works. But the more likely result is that the award has made “War is Peace” the reality.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t
  • featured stories   Warmonger Wins Peace Prize

Obama has done nothing to hold the criminal Bush regime to account, and the Obama administration has bribed and threatened the Palestinian Authority to go along with the US/Israeli plan to deep-six the UN’s Goldstone Report on Israeli war crimes committed during Israel’s inhuman military attack on the defenseless civilian population in the Gaza Ghetto.

The US Ministry of Truth is delivering the Obama administration’s propaganda that Iran only notified the IAEA of its “secret” new nuclear facility because Iran discovered that US intelligence had discovered the “secret” facility. This propaganda is designed to undercut the fact of Iran’s compliance with the Safeguards Agreement and to continue the momentum for a military attack on Iran.

The Nobel committee has placed all its hopes on a bit of skin color.

“War is Peace” is now the position of the formerly antiwar organization, Code Pink. Code Pink has decided that women’s rights are worth a war in Afghanistan.

When justifications for war become almost endless–oil, hegemony, women’s rights, democracy, revenge for 9/11, denying bases to al Qaeda and protecting against terrorists–war becomes the path to peace.

The Nobel committee has bestowed the prestige of its Peace Prize on Newspeak and Doublethink.

State Law Aims To Crack Down On Identity Theft

Posted in Economy, Identity Theft, Legal, Life Improvement with tags , , on October 12, 2009 by truthwillrise

A new state law that went into effect this month broadens the definition of identity theft and strengthens the penalties against the crime.

The law was proposed by Gov. M Jodi Rell and builds on reforms the Republican has advocated for since taking office.

In 2005, for example, Rell formed an Identity Theft Advisory Board, which brought together state agencies and organizations to identify vulnerabilities, develop remedies and establish much stronger penalties for criminals who misappropriate the identifying information of others, including Social Security numbers, credit card numbers and other personal data.

“Identity theft is an incredibly destructive crime,” Rell said in a written statement. “It not only robs victims of assets, but it can have devastating, long-term effects on everything from personal credit to security clearances.”

In 2008, there were 10 million identity theft victims in the United States, a 22 percent increases compared to 2007, according to a study done by Javelin Strategy and Research. Additionally, 1.6 million households experienced fraud not related to credit cards. For example, their bank accounts or debit cards were compromised.

Households with incomes higher than $70,000 were twice as likely to experience identity theft as those with salaries under $50,000, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

And while the threat of identity theft is frightening the consequences of actually experiencing it can cost major time and money.

According to the nonprofit Identity Theft Resource Center, it can take up to 5,840 hours, or the equivalent of working a full-time job for two years to correct the damage from ID theft, depending on the severity of the case.

The average victim spends 330 hours repairing the damage.

Meanwhile, businesses across the world lose $221 billion a year due to identity theft, and the average cost per victim is about $500, according to Javelin Strategy and Research.

The new state laws, which took effect Oct. 1, broaden the definition of identity theft by eliminating the requirement that personal identifying information be obtained without permission. Under the act, a person commits identity theft when he or she knowingly uses another’s personal identifying information to obtain or attempt to obtain money, credit, goods, services, property, or medical information.

The law also toughens penalties for those convicted of victimizing senior citizens age 60 or older, by lowering the threshold for what constitutes identity theft in the first and second degree.

By law, identity theft in the first degree is now committed when the value of the goods or services stolen is greater than $5,000. Prior to that, the threshold was $10,000. Identity theft in the second degree is committed against someone age 60 or older when the value of goods or services stolen is any amount.

Rell said elderly victims can find it especially difficult to recover from identity theft because of the complexity and red tape involved, which is why she lobbied for those specific guidelines in the legislation.

The new law also creates the crime of unlawful possession of personal access devices, such as credit card readers or scanners, account numbers, personal identification numbers or PIN numbers.

Additionally, the new also establishes a Privacy Protection Guaranty and Enforcement Account, which will be funded with fines imposed on violators and property forfeited under the act’s provisions.

The fund will be used to help individuals whose identity has been stolen.

Finally, the law also extends from two years to three years the period in which a victim can sue for damages against a person convicted of stealing their identity and requires, rather than allows, a court to issue orders correcting public records.

 Identity theft is an international crime and is only getting started and it is not if but when you will become a victim of this horrible crime. We will all need something to combat this problem in all phases and facets. To learn more about identity theft, and learn about the most comprehensive ID theft plan out there, log on to http://www.prepaidlegal.com/idt/bking62.

 

A new world order

Posted in economic tyranny, Economy, International Bankers, New World Order, News, The Federal Reserve with tags , , , , , on October 12, 2009 by truthwillrise

The hype around China would suggest the world’s third largest economy might be the next superpower, but the mania might be premature

 

Global issues were the focus of media coverage and discussions in the last couple of weeks, with the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, accompanied by a G20 summit in Pittsburgh, followed by G7 finance chiefs meeting in Istanbul just before the annual joint meeting of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. Though much of the talk is about economy and its ills international relations were not absent.

There is little doubt that the economic power of traditional leading countries is declining, and the US is losing edge gradually even if it is still the world’s largest economy. Also, rising economic powers like China, India and Brazil are gaining more share of the global economy than previously anticipated. That is driving some analysts and writers to be carried away somehow to reach a conclusion that economic power is going to be reflected in political dominance and soon those emerging economies will change the current world order. Some argue that a multi-polar new world order is in the making, and few are taking it to the extreme, anticipating China, for example, will overtake US as the only superpower.

Traditional leading powers admitted in the Pittsburgh summit that management of global economy should be broader to include emerging economies. That is why G20 is replacing G7 officially next year. That reflects the new facts made clear in the latest global financial crisis and efforts to get the global economy out of recession. Moreover, developed countries are aware of the limited capacity in their economies and the spare room for expansion in emerging economies.

Following the Marxist line of analysis, economic power is the essential factor in assuming political might and hence China is the legitimate candidate to assume global leadership. Even if military power is still a major factor in defining the status of a superpower, the Chinese are building theirs and annoying the Americans every now and then. But, are the Chinese themselves seeking that role as the main pole in international relations? There is no clear answer, and China-mania is just hyping that suggestion.

Market model

Now the third-largest global economy and the most populated country on earth (more than 1.3 billion people), China is still building its economy. Speed of economic development in the last three decades was not at all matched in political reform or even sound social mobility. Almost a third of Chinese live in poverty, and the gap between super-rich and middle class is wide. Besides, the model of so-call “socialist market economy” is less sustainable than traditional free market in the West, Japan and South Korea for instance. China still ranks number 104 among world countries in GDP per capita.

As China’s economic emergence relied mainly on manufacturing for export, it attracted big corporations from the West and Japan to manufacture in its special economic zones. The struggle is still going on; such multinational firms are pushing for its business model to dominate and Chinese authorities are resisting a full-fledged capitalist market model. Though it seems that both parties are in a lull now, co-habiting each other’s rules, it is difficult to imagine things going on like this. The political elite in China did not want to lose their privilege, and they know if they are to compete for world leadership they might have to go through the change witnessed in Central and Eastern Europe in the last two decades.

The race for raw materials and energy is an evident area of struggle between China and traditional world powers, in the Middle East and Africa in particular, but also in Latin America. But China is aware that assuming the role of global superpower is not in its economic interest in absolute terms. It would have to shoulder the view from under-developed countries as an “imperialist economic power” draining resources and imposing marketing to accumulate profit. That is why China’s leadership prefers to get their economic needs and open markets in a subtle way.

There might be a new world order in the making, most likely with new powers rising to replace the hegemony of the West, but China and the like are not taking over traditional world powers — at least for now or the near future.