Archive for December 9, 2008

Financial Times Editorial Admits Agenda For Dictatorial World Government

Posted in News, Truth/Freedom on December 9, 2008 by truthwillrise


Financial Times Editorial Admits Agenda For Dictatorial World Government

Paul Joseph Watson
Tuesday, December 9, 2008

The Financial Times, one of the most respected and widely read newspapers on the planet, features an editorial today that openly admits the agenda to create a world government based on anti-democratic principles and concedes that the term “global governance” is merely a euphemism for the move towards a centralized global government.

For years we were called paranoid nutcases for warning about the elite’s plans to centralize global power and destroy American sovereignty. Throughout the 1990’s people who talked about the alarming move towards global government were smeared as right-wing lunatics by popular culture and the media.

Now the agenda is out in the open and in our faces, the debunkers have no more ammunition with which to deride us.

A jaw-dropping editorial written by the Financial Times’ chief foreign affairs commentator Gideon Rachman entitled ‘And now for a world government’ lays out the plan for global government and how it is being pushed with deceptive language and euphemisms in order to prevent people from becoming alarmed.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

“For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible,” writes Rachman, citing the financial crisis, “global warming” and the “global war on terror” as three major pretexts through which it is being introduced.

Rachman writes that “global governance” could be introduced much sooner than many expect and that President elect Barack Obama has already expressed his desire to achieve that goal, making reference to Obama’s circle of advisors which includes Strobe Talbott, who in 1992 stated, “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

Rachman then concedes that the more abstract term “global governance,” which is often used by top globalists like David Rockefeller as a veil to offset accusations that a centralized global government is the real agenda, is merely a trick of “soothing language” that is used to prevent “people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland”.

“But some European thinkers think that they recognise what is going on,” says Rachman. “Jacques Attali, an adviser to President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, argues that: “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.” As far as he is concerned, some form of global government cannot come too soon. Mr Attali believes that the “core of the international financial crisis is that we have global financial markets and no global rule of law”.

Rachman proceeds to outline what the first steps to an official world government would look like, including the creation of “A legally binding climate-change agreement negotiated under the auspices of the UN and the creation of a 50,000-strong UN peacekeeping force”.

“A “world government” would involve much more than co-operation between nations,” writes Rachman. “It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.”

“So, it seems, everything is in place. For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, an opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government,” concludes Rachman, before acknowledging that the path to global government will be “slow and painful”.

Tellingly, Rachman concedes that “International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic,” citing the continual rejection of EU expansion when the question is put to a vote. “In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters,” writes Rachman.

So there you have it – one of the world’s top newspapers, editorially led by chief economics commentator Martin Wolf, a top Bilderberg luminary, openly proclaiming that not only is world government the agenda, but that world government will only be achieved through dictatorial measures because the majority of the people are dead against it.

Will we still be called paranoid conspiracy theorists for warning that a system of dictatorial world government is being set up, even as one of the world’s most influential newspapers admits to the fact? Or will people finally wake up and accept that there is a globalist agenda to destroy sovereignty, any form of real democracy, and freedom itself in the pursuit of an all-powerful, self-interested, centralized, unrepresentative and dictatorial world government?


Posted in News, Truth/Freedom on December 9, 2008 by truthwillrise
Friday, 05 December 2008 04:49
By Chuck Baldwin
“Change you can believe in.” This was Barack Obama’s campaign slogan. There is no doubt that the American Chuck Baldwinpeople were fed up with George W. Bush and his fellow Republicans. Who can blame them?

After campaigning for change back in 1999 (What political challenger doesn’t campaign for change?), President Bush and his fellow neocons promptly set out to continue business as usual in Washington, D.C. Federal spending and meddling exploded under the leadership of the GOP. In fact, one has to go back to the administrations of Franklin D. Roosevelt to match the increases in Big Government and Big Brother by Bush and Company. Add to the out-of-control spending habits of the GOP an unnecessary war, a near-Depression economy, and a burgeoning police state. It is no surprise that the American people were ready for change. And Obama excelled in delivering the message of change. So, what kind of change will Obama actually deliver?

 Will Obama remove U.S. troops from Iraq and Afghanistan? Probably not. Oh, he might reduce troops in Iraq, but if anyone believes that he will not leave a significant U.S. presence in Iraq, they are living in a dream world. Furthermore, many, if not most, of the troops from Iraq will most likely find themselves in Afghanistan. Mark my words; Barack Obama has no plans to remove U.S. troops from the Middle East. Net result: no change.

What about America’s economic woes? What changes will Barack Obama bring to the table? Hardly any. America will continue it’s trademark deficit spending; we will continue to send manufacturing jobs overseas; so-called “free trade” deals will continue to advance; Big Business will continue to receive government bailouts; the Federal Reserve will continue to call the shots for America’s financial decisions (and reap gargantuan profits in the process); Congress will continue to be inept, irresponsible, and clueless; there will be no attempt to return the United States to sound money principles; and there will be no reduction in foreign aid. In a nutshell, it will be business as usual in Washington, D.C., and New York City.

Don’t get me wrong: Barack Obama will doubtless throw out some bones to his liberal supporters in much the same way that Republican presidents throw out a bone or two to their conservative constituents. Watch for Obama to overturn the ban on embryonic stem cell research. America’s upper income earners can expect some sort of tax increase. No doubt oil companies will end up losing some tax exemptions. Watch for additional environmentalist policies to be enacted. And, yes, there will be some sort of “universal health care” proposal. But the Bush administration has already given America a socialized financial system, so how can Republicans complain about socialized medicine?

Obama might try to resurrect the “Fairness Doctrine.” Some suggest that Obama might try to rid the prohibition of homosexuals serving in the armed forces, but I doubt that he will take on this one. The political net gain would not be worth the potential fallout.

Although he might want to, I doubt that Obama will actively promote additional gun control (Democrats always lose when this happens). He may push for a ban on “high capacity” magazines that hold over ten rounds, as Bill Clinton did. If Obama does not go after guns directly, we can expect some sort of attack on ammunition (which is already happening) that will drive up the cost of ammo even more. Of course, some sort of gun confiscation or martial law could materialize in the wake of another “terrorist” attack. But a McCain administration would act no differently, so, again, the net result is zero change. Remember, it was Republican George W. Bush who expunged Posse Comitatus and deployed 20,000 army troops on U.S. soil to be used for domestic law enforcement. If Obama really wanted to bring about change, he would reverse Bush’s draconian decisions, would he not? Don’t hold your breath.

We can also expect more harassment of gun owners and lawful gun dealers by the BATFE. But this is no change at all. The current leadership at BATFE is already about as hostile to gun owners and gun dealers as it can possibly be. An Obama BATFE will be no worse. But neither will it be any better. Net result: no change.

So, what will be the overall change to the direction of America? Answer: there will be no change to the overall direction of the country. There will be no change to the welfare state. There will be little change to the warfare state. No change to NATO, except to expand it. Very little change, if any, to foreign policy. No change to America’s open sieves, otherwise called national borders. And there will be absolutely no change to the burgeoning New World Order that began in earnest under both Bushes and Bill Clinton.

The NAFTA superhighway will have the support of the Obama administration. The North American Community will proceed unimpeded by the Obama White House. In all likelihood, the Amero (a common currency with Canada and Mexico) will materialize during Obama’s first term. But this would all have happened had John McCain been elected. No change here.

One reason why it is so easy to predict a business-as-usual Obama Presidency is the people that Obama has surrounded himself with. Former New York Federal Reserve chairman Timothy Geithner* for Secretary of the Treasury; former Secretary of the Treasury Lawrence Summers* for National Economic Council director; Bush’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates* will keep his job; Illinois Representative Rahm Emanuel for Obama’s Chief of Staff; Hillary Clinton for Secretary of State; Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano* for Secretary of Homeland Security; former South Dakota Senator Tom Daschle* to head the Health and Human Services Department; former Assistant Attorney General Eric Holder to be Attorney General; New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson* as Secretary of Commerce; Susan Rice* for U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations; Paul Volcker* for the Economic Recovery Advisory Board; James Steinberg* as Deputy Secretary of State; Mona Sutphen* for Deputy White House Chief of Staff, and Louis Caldera* for Director of the White House Military Office.

Does anyone see “change” with the above names? Every one of them is a longtime political insider. And at least eleven of them (those with an asterisk [*] behind their names, above) are members of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). In fact, six out of the eleven cabinet-level positions in the Obama administration are CFR members.

The CFR has dominated both Democrat and Republican Presidential administrations for decades. Presidents such as Dwight Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton have all been members of the CFR. Vice Presidents such as Hubert Humphrey, Nelson Rockefeller, Walter Mondale, and Dick Cheney have been CFR members. And over the last several decades, practically every secretary of defense, secretary of the treasury, and most CIA directors have been CFR members. And let’s not forget that this year’s Republican Presidential nominee, John McCain, is a CFR member.

Do you now see why–no matter who is elected President of the United States–nothing changes? Republican or Democrat, it does not matter: the CFR and their collaborators remain in power. And as Sonny and Cher used to sing, “The Beat Goes On.”

There will be no real change in Washington, D.C., until the CFR and their elitist cronies are thoroughly and universally removed from power. And the only way this will happen is if we elect an Independent President of the United States (someone who truly understands the New World Order and is dedicated to defeating it), because the two major parties will never allow someone opposed to the CFR to become their nominee. The only Republican candidate for President in 2008 who demonstrated those credentials was Dr. Ron Paul. And to a lesser degree, the only Democrat who even seemed to vaguely understand this was Dennis Kucinich. Notice that both men were thoroughly repudiated by their respective parties’ leadership and all but totally ignored by the national news media. (The CFR and their surrogates also control the national news media. What a coincidence!)

So, while the occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue may have changed, there will be no real change to the direction of these United States. Count on it!

*This is the final call for FREEDOM DOCUMENTS. Orders must be received by Wednesday, December 10. To order FREEDOM DOCUMENTS, click below:


*If you enjoyed this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.

© Chuck Baldwin

Dr. Chuck Baldwin – is a Radio Talk Show host, syndicated columnist, and pastor dedicated to
preserving the historic principles upon which America was founded.
We Invite You To Visit Chuck Baldwin’s Website

Email Chuck Baldwin: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Dr. Chuck Baldwin articles can be emailed to a friend with just two clicks!
Click the email link near the article headline.

Dr. Chuck Baldwin Bio and Archives

The Most Important Thing You Could Read All Year

Posted in News, Truth/Freedom on December 9, 2008 by truthwillrise
The United States Isn’t a Country — It’s a Corporation!
by Lisa Guliani

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
— Preamble of the original “organic” Constitution

“We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.”
— Excerpted from the Declaration of Independence of the original thirteen united states of America, July 4, 1776

Fourth of July 2002 has come and gone, and Americans honored the holiday with a renewed patriotic fervor that reminded me of the Bicentennial celebrations of 1976. As is customary, traditional fireworks displays took center stage and scores of people turned out to witness the dazzling show in the summer sky. With mixed feelings, I sat with friends on a crowded Pennsylvania sidewalk beneath a glittering, mesmerizing explosion of color, pondering the keen sense of sadness and betrayal that overwhelmed my spirit. Looking around at the huge crowds gathered for the annual events, I thought silently, “We are not free.” In truth, we have not been a free people for a very long time.

We celebrate this day in honor of our “independence”. We call ourselves a free people in a land of liberty. Our anthems proudly sing the praises of this nation, and we raise our voices, wave our flags and join in song — but how many Americans realize they are not free? This is a myth perpetuated by the powers-that-be in order to avoid any major civil unrest, and to keep us all living under the thumb of a militaristic corporate Big Brother within the illusions that have been created for us. The truth of the matter is this: what freedom has not been stolen from us, we have surrendered willingly through our silence and ignorance. As Americans, most of us have no idea how our freedoms are maintained — or lost. Apparently, our ancestors didn’t have a good grasp of this either. It is sad, but it is also very true.

Don’t point to that beloved parchment, the Constitution, as a symbol of your enduring freedom. It is representative of a form of government which seemingly no longer exists in this country today. The Constitution has been thrown out the window, the Republic shoved aside and replaced with a democracy. The thing is; most people in this country remain unaware that this is so because they simply do not know the truth — what lies beyond the myths. Your so-called government is not going to tell you, either.

To even begin to understand what has happened to the Republic, we must look backward in time to the period following the Civil War. We must go back to the year 1871, which was the beginning of the decline of the Republic. When we examine what happened during that time in our history, we begin to piece together this troubling, perplexing puzzle that is “America” — only then should we answer as to whether we are indeed a “free” people or not.

So, let’s roll backward into the past for a moment. It is time we learned what they didn’t teach us in school. It is far more interesting than what they DID tell us. I think you’ll stay awake for this lesson.


The date is February 21, 1871 and the Forty-First Congress is in session. I refer you to the “Acts of the Forty-First Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62. On this date in the history of our nation, Congress passed an Act titled: “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia.” This is also known as the “Act of 1871.” What does this mean? Well, it means that Congress, under no constitutional authority to do so, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which is a ten mile square parcel of land.

What??? How could they do that? Moreover, WHY would they do that? To explain, let’s look at the circumstances of those days. The Act of 1871 was passed at a vulnerable time in America. Our nation was essentially bankrupt — weakened and financially depleted in the aftermath of the Civil War. The Civil War itself was nothing more than a calculated “front” for some pretty fancy footwork by corporate backroom players. It was a strategic maneuver by European interests (the international bankers) who were intent upon gaining a stranglehold on the neck (and the coffers) of America.

The Congress realized our country was in dire financial straits, so they cut a deal with the international bankers — (in those days, the Rothschilds of London were dipping their fingers into everyone’s pie) thereby incurring a DEBT to said bankers. If we think about banks, we know they do not just lend us money out of the goodness of their hearts. A bank will not do anything for you unless it is entirely in their best interest to do so. There has to be some sort of collateral or some string attached which puts you and me (the borrower) into a subservient position. This was true back in 1871 as well. The conniving international bankers were not about to lend our floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a brilliant way of getting their foot in the door of the United States (a prize they had coveted for some time, but had been unable to grasp thanks to our Founding Fathers, who despised them and held them in check), and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed.

In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original “organic” version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the “Act of 1871,” our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word “for” was changed to the word “of” in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:

“The Constitution for the united states of America”.

The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.

Capitalization — an insignificant change? Not when one is referring to the context of a legal document, it isn’t. Such minor alterations have had major impacts on each subsequent generation born in this country. What the Congress did with the passage of the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia. The kind of government THEY created was a corporation. The new, altered Constitution serves as the constitution of the corporation, and not that of America. Think about that for a moment.

Incidentally, this corporate constitution does not benefit the Republic. It serves only to benefit the corporation. It does nothing good for you or me — and it operates outside of the original Constitution. Instead of absolute rights guaranteed under the “organic” Constitution, we now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example of this is the Sovereign’s right to travel, which has been transformed under corporate government policy into a “privilege” which we must be licensed to engage in. This operates outside of the original Constitution.

So, Congress committed TREASON against the People, who were considered Sovereign under the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. When we consider the word “Sovereign,” we must think about what the word means.

According to Webster’s Dictionary, “sovereign” is defined as: 1. chief or highest; supreme. 2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others. 3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.

In other words, our government was created by and for “sovereigns” — the free citizens who were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be sovereign — remember that. Government cannot be sovereign. We can also look to the Declaration of Independence, where we read: “government is subject to the consent of the governed” — that’s supposed to be us, the sovereigns. Do you feel like a sovereign nowadays? I don’t.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist or a constitutional historian to figure out that this is not what is happening in our country today. Government in these times is NOT subject to the consent of the governed. Rather, the governed are subject to the whim and greed of the corporation, which has stretched its tentacles beyond the ten-mile-square parcel of land known as the District of Columbia — encroaching into every state of the Republic. Mind you, the corporation has NO jurisdiction outside of the District of Columbia. THEY just want you to think it does.

You see, you are presumed to know the law. This is ironic because as a people, we are taught basically nothing about the law in school. We are made to memorize obscure factoids and paragraphs here and there, such as the Preamble, and they gloss over the Bill of Rights. But we are not told about the law. Nor do our corporate government schools delve into the Constitution in any great depth. After all, they were put into place to indoctrinate and dumb down the masses — not to teach us anything. We were not told that we were sold-out to foreign interests and made beneficiaries of the debt incurred by Congress to the international bankers. For generations, American citizens have had the bulk of their earnings confiscated to pay on a massive debt that they, as a People, did not incur. There are many, many things the People have not been told. How do you feel about being made a beneficiary of somebody else’s massive debt without your knowledge or consent? Are we gonna keep going along with this??

When you hear some individuals say that the Constitution is null and void, think about how our government has transformed over time from a municipal or service-oriented entity to a corporate or profit-oriented entity. We are living under the myth that this is lawful, but it is not. We are being ruled by a “de facto,” or unlawful, form of government — the corporate body of the death-mongers — The Controllers.

With the passage of the Act of 1871, a series of subtle and overt deceptions were set in motion — all in conjunction and collusion with the Congress, who knowingly and deliberately sold the People down the river. Did they tell you this in government school? I doubt it. They were too busy drumming the fictional version of history into your brain — and mine. By failing to disclose what THEY did to the American People, the people became ignorant of what was happening. Over time, the Republic took it on the chin to the point of a knockdown. With the surrender of their gold in 1933, the People essentially surrendered their law. I don’t suppose you were taught THAT in school either. That’s because our REAL history is hidden from us. This is the way Roman Civil Law works — and our form of governance today is based upon Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law — better known as the “Divine Right of Kings” and “Law of the Seas”, respectively. This explains a lot. Roman Civil Law was fully established in the original colonies even before our nation began and is also known as private international law.

The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union. The various arms of the corporation are known as “departments” such as the Judiciary, Justice and Treasury. You recognize those names? Yes, you do! But they are not what you assume them to be. These “departments” all belong to the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. They do NOT belong to you and me under the corporate constitution and its various amendments that operate outside of the Constitutional Republic.

I refer you to the UNITED STATES CODE (note the capitalization, indicating the corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated unequivocally that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. Realize, too, that the corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It IS the government. YOUR government. This is extremely important. I refer to this as the “corporate empire of the UNITED STATES,” which operates under Roman Civil Law outside of the Constitution. How do you like being ruled by a cheesy, sleazy corporation? You’ll ask your Congressperson about this, you say? HA!!

Congress is fully aware of this deception. You must be made aware that the members of Congress do NOT work for you and me. Rather, they work for the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Is this really any surprise to you? This is why we can’t get them to do anything on our behalf or to answer to us — as in the case with the illegal income tax — among many other things. Contrary to popular belief, they are NOT our civil servants. They do NOT work for us. They are the servants of the corporate government and carry out its bidding. Period.

The great number of committees and sub-committees that the Congress has created all work together like a multi-headed monster to oversee the various corporate “departments.” And, you should know that every single one of these that operates outside the District of Columbia is in violation of the law. The corporate government of the UNITED STATES has no jurisdiction or authority in ANY state of the Republic beyond the District of Columbia. Let this sink into your brain for a minute. Ask yourself, “Could this deception REALLY have occurred without the full knowledge and complicity of the Congress?” Do you think it happened by accident? You are deceiving yourself if you do. There are no accidents or coincidences. It is time to confront the truth and awaken from ignorance.

Your legislators will not apprise you of this information. You are presumed to know the law. THEY know you don’t know the law, or your history for that matter, because this information has not been taught to you. No concerted effort has been made to inform you. As a Sovereign, you are entitled to full disclosure of the facts. As a slave, you are entitled to nothing other than what the corporation decides to “give” you — at a price. Be wary of accepting so-called “benefits” of the corporation of the UNITED STATES. Aren’t you enslaved enough already?

I said (above) that you are presumed to know the law. Still, it matters not if you don’t in the eyes of the corporation. Ignorance of the law is not considered an excuse. It is your responsibility and your obligation as an American to learn about the law and how it applies to you. THEY count on the fact that most people are too uninterested or distracted or lazy to do so. The People have been mentally conditioned to allow the alleged government to do their thinking for them. We need to turn that around if we are to save our Republic before it is too late.

The UNITED STATES government is basically a corporate instrument of the international bankers. This means YOU are owned by the corporation from birth to death. The corporate UNITED STATES also holds ownership of all your assets, your property, and even your children. Does this sound untrue? Think long and hard about all those bills you pay, all those various taxes and fines and licenses you must pay for. Yes, they’ve got you by the pockets. Actually, they’ve had you by the ass for as long as you’ve been alive. In your heart, you know it’s true. Don’t believe any of this? Read up on the 14th Amendment. Check out how “free” you really are.

With the Act of 1871 and subsequent legislation such as the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment, our once-great nation of Sovereigns has been subverted from a Republic to a democracy. As is the case under Roman Civil Law, our ignorance of the facts has led to our silence. Our silence has been construed as our consent to become beneficiaries of a debt we did not incur. The Sovereign People have been deceived for hundreds of years into thinking they remain free and independent, when in actuality we continue to be slaves and servants of the corporation.

Treason was committed against the People in 1871 by the Congress. This could have been corrected through the decades by some honest men (assuming there were some), but it was not, mainly due to lust for money and power. Nothing new there. Are we to forgive and justify this crime against the People? You have lost more freedom than you may realize due to corporate infiltration of the so-called government. We will lose more unless we turn away from a democracy that is the direct road to disaster — and restore our Constitutional Republic.

In an upcoming article, we’ll take a closer look at the purportedly ratified 14th Amendment and how we became “property” of the corporation and enslaved by our silence.

I am saddened to think about the brave men and women who were killed in all the wars and conflicts instigated by the Controllers. These courageous souls fought for the preservation of ideals they believed to be true — not for the likes of a corporation. Do you believe that any one of the individuals who have been killed as a result of war would have willingly fought if they knew the full truth? Do you think one person would have laid down his life for a corporation? I think not. If the People had known long ago to what extent their trust had been betrayed, I wonder how long it would have taken for another Revolution. What we need is a Revolution in THOUGHT. We change our thinking and we change our world.

Will we ever restore the Republic? That is a question I cannot answer yet. I hope, and most of all — pray — that WE, the Sovereign People, will work together in a spirit of cooperation to make it happen in this lifetime. I know I will give it my best shot — come what may. Our children deserve their rightful legacy — the liberty our ancestors fought so hard to give to us. Will we remain silent telling ourselves we are free, and perpetuate the MYTH? Or, do we stand as One Sovereign People, and take back what has been stolen from the house of our Republic?

Something to think about — it’s called freedom.



My heartfelt thanks goes out to the following people for their gracious and generous assistance in researching this subject: Ken S. of American Revolution II Online News, Paul Walker of RMN News, Bob Taft, Stanooch, and Willy Whitten — true Patriots, one and all.


Further reading:




If we are stupid enough to surrender our freedom to a bunch of lousy international bankers, then we deserve to live in bondage.  — Lisa Guliani


See also:


Obama and the World Crisis

Posted in News, Truth/Freedom on December 9, 2008 by truthwillrise

Obama and The World Crisis


Richard C. Cook
Global Research
December 8, 2008

Even as preparations are underway for Barack Obama to assume office as the 44th president of the United States on January 20, the U.S. military juggernaut that is roaring toward global conquest hasn’t missed a beat. This is shown by the team of hawks—including holdover Robert Gates at Defense and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State—that Obama has assembled to handle the levers of the war machine and its diplomatic front.


The horrors of the George W. Bush administration may only have been one chapter, though it was the actions of Bush and his cronies—starting with 9/11— which removed all doubt that the intent of the Western ruling class is to dominate the world by any means possible.

Behind this intent are the people David Rockefeller famously identified at a 1991 meeting of the Bilderberg Group, when he said: “The supra-national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.” No one needs conspiracy theories when the perpetrators are this blatant.

Rockefeller and his internationalist associates have not just made untold fortunes. They have also immeasurably damaged the nation our forefathers created and which offered them the freedom to become rich and powerful. Ironically, it was John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who restored the Virginia colonial capital in Williamsburg where on May 15, 1776 the Virginia Convention instructed their delegates in Philadelphia to enter a motion for independence.

But 1776 was another era, when our ancestors really believed that “all men are created equal” and that “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” were “inalienable rights.” Today, the globalist financiers are trying to shore up the world’s failing financial institutions. But they are doing nothing to stem the slide into a worldwide depression that is starting to destroy the livelihoods of huge numbers of people.


What this really means is that the financial controllers are robbing the world of the peace and prosperity that could be in reach through economic democracy and the fair distribution of resources. It would not be that difficult for us to engage in mindful cultivation of the Earth’s bounty in order to provide a decent living for all.

It could be done by changing the way money is created–from the debt-based system where credit is introduced only through bank lending to grassroots systems of credit creation advocated by the monetary reform movement. This could be done if credit were treated as a public utility, like clean air, water, or electricity, not the private property of the financial elite. Two good examples of this movement are the ideas of Social Credit based on providing citizens’ dividends similar to the Alaska Permanent Fund and the American Monetary Act of the American Monetary Institute that advocates direct payment by government for public expenditures as with the Civil War Greenbacks. .

It is the mis-definition of credit that allowed the banks to create the massive speculative bubbles in housing, commercial real estate, equity and hedge funds, commodities, and derivatives that have exploded. These bubbles can never be re-inflated, no matter how many trillions of dollars the government injects into the failed trickle-down system. The bubbles cannot be re-inflated because the public cannot afford to repay the loans they are ultimately based on. Consumer purchasing power is spiraling downward practically by the day as jobs disappear.

The banking system and the military machine work hand-in-hand, because the financial system is so unbalanced and exploitative that it can only be maintained through brutal force, both within and among nations.


The mailed fist of Western military might is the embodiment of the drive toward global dominance that goes back at least to the 15th century. It was then that the emerging nations along the Atlantic coast of Europe—Spain, Portugal, France, the Netherlands, and England—began to send armed soldiers abroad on sailing ships bristling with cannon. The purpose? To conquer the territory and secure the wealth of older cultures which lacked the military means to defend themselves.

These swashbucklers were bolstered by two ingredients essential to any such large-scale undertaking. One was a source of money to finance the enterprise, and the other was an ideology that could be used to assuage the nagging of conscience which naturally arises whilst taking the lives and stealing the property of fellow human beings.

The first requirement—money—was initially met by looting the indigenous cultures of the Americas of their gold and silver, then using it to capitalize the fledgling banking system. Similar looting has continued until today.

Stops along the way included the British takeover of the fabled wealth of India, the plantations of America being worked by slaves dragged from Africa, the Chinese Opium Wars, and the Anglo-American conquest of the Middle East and its oil. Facilitating the mayhem was creation of the fractional reserve banking system overseen by the Bank of England, founded in 1694, and the Federal Reserve, which dates to 1913.

The second need was for an ethnocentric religion–Christianity–that justified the killing and enslavement of non-believers who in most cases had never even heard of it before. This was satisfactorily met by the Christian churches which adopted the geopolitical exigency that white men who worshiped at their altars were entitled to rule the Earth.

The nations so fortunate as to find themselves in the forefront of progress acquired the wherewithal to add to their wealth through an ideology based on exclusive ownership of the fruits of science and technology. As the Industrial Revolution developed, the only choice seemed to be control of the means of production either by the capitalist elite or the totalitarian state.

The white man’s greed propelled them into countless wars of aggression around the globe along with two fratricidal wars—World Wars I and II. In these wars tens of millions of were slain. These calamities left standing the greatest white Western nation of all—the United States.

This was both just and natural, since it was the U.S. with its melting pot that blended denizens of all the warring European nations, including the Jews who arose from the Khazar region of Russia and, moving to the West, came to dominate high-finance.

The U.S. enjoyed the size, resource wealth, and geographic situation—North America being a natural fortress—to serve as headquarters for what is now the final assault on the regions still not entirely subdued—namely the giant mainland nations on the continent of Asia. Along the way, America’s minority races, most notably its African-Americans, demanded and were granted at least a semblance of equal rights under the law. To their credit, many Jewish-Americans were instrumental in securing the victories of the civil rights movement.


So Barack Obama was elected. Now president-elect, he has stepped into a scenario where the actors in the drama—the generals, arms merchants, and spies who do the dirty work—are poised for the final step in the scenario. This could go so far as instigating a Third World War to be launched against Russia and China. The military planners are preparing for it.

A flanking movement is going on in space through NASA’s new manned lunar program aimed at setting up what could be a military base at the Moon’s south pole. Russia and China, along with the European Space Agency and India, are competitors in the race to colonize the Moon and use it for military advantage.

This culminating phase of world disorder began in earnest with the Reagan military build-up in the 1980s and the “Reagan Doctrine” of proxy-wars against supposedly left-leaning nations, including the funding of Osama bin Laden’s Islamic mujaheddin who fought against the Soviets in Afghanistan.

Reagan took the first steps toward weaponizing space through his Strategic Defense Initiative—“Star Wars”—program announced in 1983. This failed when the Air Force’s test platform—the space shuttle—was grounded after the Challenger disaster of January 28, 1986. (Richard C. Cook, Challenger Revealed: An Insider’s Account of How the Reagan Administration Caused the Greatest Tragedy of the Space Age)

In 1991 the Soviet Union broke apart, with George H. W. Bush taking advantage of the confusion by launching an attack on Iraq. But there was unfinished business in Europe. Yugoslavia was a Slavic nation with ties to Russia. Presto, during the Clinton administration the Serbs were identified as engaged in “ethnic-cleansing,” and through 38,000 bombing sorties by NATO over a 78-day period, the Balkans were re-Balkanized and the bankers who ran the European Union were able to move in for the takeover of that sorrow-filled region.

With the Balkan front secured, the military under George W. Bush next used the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to invade Afghanistan and—again—Iraq. Israel was along for the ride, though it is often difficult to tell which of the two—the U.S. or Israel—is the pilot and which the co-pilot.

By the end of the Bush administration, Obama, in his presidential campaign, was calling for escalation of the conflict in Afghanistan, possibly intended by the script writers as a flanking movement to cut off Russia from Iran. This appears to be the start of the final Western assault on South Asia. Pakistan in particular is now high on the list of U.S. targets, with Obama saying he will send in U.S. forces whenever warranted.


The Muslims of Pakistan were once among the most highly cultured people on Earth. But the West never gave up on control of the Indian Subcontinent, even after independence. The British had adopted a divide-and-conquer strategy by supporting the 1946 partition between India and Pakistan, and Pakistan’s aspirations were destroyed in the 1970s when the Western intelligence agencies attacked the great nationalist modernizer, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. They did this by instigating a fundamentalist revolt, followed by a military coup by Pakistan’s U.S.-backed generals.

Now, with the recent attacks on Mumbai by Islamic assailants and India refusing to relinquish Kashmir, Pakistan and India can be managed separately, even as India becomes more dependent on the U.S. for nuclear technology. Iran, which is being surrounded, will likely soon find that its number has finally come up.

It is unclear the extent to which South Asia can and will maintain its self-determination. But once the region is controlled, the war against Russia and China can start in earnest. However, a parallel attempt is being made to absorb Russia through rapprochement between it and the E.U. If this feint succeeds, the wealth of Siberia may fall into the hands of the Western bankers without a shot ever being fired, though the European financiers will enjoy a clear advantage in reaping the spoils over the Americans. Such an attempt to bring Russia under Western financial control took place in the 1990s but failed when Putin took over.

Today, military planners likely assume that China, the West’s great bogeyman for the 21st century, will be backed into a corner. But the Chinese, who know that a strong economy sooner or later will translate into military power, grow stronger all the time. Of course the inscrutable Russians may have surprises up their sleeves. They may not be holding tight to all those nukes for nothing.

Some might object that the Western military planners, especially those within the U.S., are skating on thin ice due to the financial crisis. But the crisis has not stopped the war effort. It is funneling more of the wealth into the hands of the bankers than ever before, thereby enriching the ones who are in charge and providing them with increased material security from which to rule. U.S. military leaders have lobbied for budget increases, and Obama appears poised to accommodate them. Because investors are flocking to Treasury securities as a save haven from stock market losses, there is no shortage of borrowed money.

Granted, the financial crisis has reduced the income security of huge swaths of people both in the West and the developing nations and has put them ever deeper in debt. But the stressed population desperately needs jobs so will continue to provide cannon-fodder for the military and willing minds and hands to work in the defense factories and think tanks. Obama’s plan to pump money into infrastructure spending may help, but even a $600 billion stimulus is only $2,000 per capita and will take time to show results. This too is a deficit spending program based on money borrowed through the banking system.


Is there any way Barack Obama can do anything substantive to resolve the crisis?. As Australian author Omna Last recently wrote on his website ( and gave permission to reprint:

“In 2008 Barak Obama appeared from the wings, front-stage in the midst of the American melodramatic psycho-drama. He was also half-Negro and half-white. A majority of Americans were so fed up with the rule of the white-man-machine, they were willing to vote in a half-black man as president. The question was: would he have the integrity and strength of character not to compromise his principles? Would he be able to break through the ruling white-man paradigm and start an American dialogue with the rest of the world, and leave behind its incredible blind arrogance that permeates right through the culture, resulting in a subconscious belief that America’s manifest destiny is to be the arbiter of the world’s tastes, immorality and non-values?

“And would he be able to take advantage of the wisdom and strength provided by his black genes to bring a new ruling hybrid dispensation to the world? Would he be the symbol for a new type of Earth person – a true planetary representative? Would the ruling white secret brotherhood allow him to use his presidential power?

“Or would they need to worry? As a senator, Obama voted to renew the Patriot Act, supported the death penalty, affirmed Bush’s secret surveillance of the American people, and called for a cut in the corporate tax rate. He wanted to expand the war in Afghanistan, failed to call for a reduction in defense spending, and, as a tool of the Zionist lobby, was insisting that Iran even stop enriching uranium. Obama’s selection of Rahm Emanuel as White House chief of staff is a signal that Obama is either incredibly naive or has been forced by his minders to play ball with the devil.

“Obama is probably an idealistic, courageous man, who persuaded a majority of Americans to believe in their own better natures. Obama’s place at the pinnacle of official power lifts a veil that has obscured the world for a thousand years. It signifies the end of white supremacy, imperialism, racism. Every tribe and race of people, just as with each animal species, has something unique to add to the genetic and cultural brew of humanity. Although Obama was supported and promoted as a tool of the insider establishment, it may be that he will turn his back on the sleaze of his secret backers and try to institute a new paradigm. Perhaps Barack Obama is a symbol of a change in the wind, and the emergence of a new kind of man – an Earth man – one who encompasses many facets of the jeweled organism that is this planet.

“Zawahiri issued a tape declaring Obama to be a House Negro. Was Obama a naïve fool, who had been set up to sup with the devil? He is probably a good man, but naive and misguided, probably with more ambition than good sense. The chimera of power, of rubbing shoulders with the insiders of the money-power-tree had been the bait. Had the new brown fish been reeled in to shine as front-man for the men of the purveyors of an old wine in a new bottle? Was a bright new label to placed on the old bottle of American capitalism, a wine already turned sour in 1929 – but in 2008 turned quickly from unfettered free market capitalism to the secret cartel’s intervention in every pie?

“An incredibly clever game had been played. As Russia in 1917 had been secretly taken over by a Jewish financier-backed conspiracy, so in 2009 the wheels that had been set in motion by Greenspan in 1987 had been geared up. The Zionization of America was no longer a banker’s wet dream. It was now possible…people tracked by computer chip…the masses in permanent debt, desperate and afraid. Or would Obama prove to be a man of the quality of Jack Kennedy? Would he stand up to the amorphous establishment? Would he change their hearts and minds, just by the power of his convictions?”


Good questions. Only time will tell. The only thing that seems to be left out in the conniving of the financial controllers and the plans they are calmly working out on their underground supercomputers is consideration of what really is the objectively conscionable way for us to behave as human beings on this planet.

Perhaps at the cellular level the controllers have the nagging suspicion that maybe there really is a God who is not entirely comfortable with a world civilization based on exploitation, pollution, and a mad compulsion to force society to engender enough “growth” to outrace the exponential increase of compound interest.

Perhaps the controllers fear that the billions of people on Earth who are not white Western males of Judeo-Christian extraction might also have a place in His/Her heart. Perhaps Obama, despite all the compromises he has made, makes them feel a little bit uncomfortable.


Former ISI Chief: Mumbai And 9/11 Both “Inside Jobs”

Posted in 9/11, News, Truth/Freedom on December 9, 2008 by truthwillrise

Former ISI Chief: Mumbai And 9/11 Both “inside Jobs”


Paul Joseph Watson
Monday, December 8, 2008

General Hamid Gul, the former head of the Pakistani ISI, told CNN yesterday that both the Mumbai attacks and 9/11 were “inside jobs,” much to the chagrin of host and CFR luminary Fareed Zakaria, who told viewers that Gul’s opinions were “absolutely wrong and thoroughly discredited”.

“When you look at the full spectrum of possibilities, who could have done it, then one knows that Samjhauta Express was a similar case, in which Pakistan ISI was accused. But it turned out that it was the militant Hindus themselves who had killed 68 passengers in that train, and that it was an inside job,” said Gul.

“Now Colonel Srikant Purohit, who is a serving army officer, he has been caught in this particular case. And the whole thing has turned around.”

“So, obviously, there is an inside job.”

The revelation that Mukhtar Ahmed, a “counterinsurgency police officer who may have been on an undercover mission” working for Indian authorities was arrested for illegally buying mobile phone cards used by the Mumbai gunmen, allied with the numerous intelligence warnings proving that the method, arrival and targets of attack were all known well in advance, proves Gul right in his assertion that the terrorists could not have achieved such carnage without help from people on the inside.


  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

Asked by Zakaria, “What is your hunch as to who did – who perpetrated the 9/11 attacks?,” Gul responded, “Well, I have been on record, and I said it is the Zionists or the neocons. They have done it. It was an inside job.”

“And they wanted to go on the world conquerors. They were looking upon it as an opportunity window, when the Muslim world was lying prostrate. Russia was nowhere in sight. China was still not an economic giant that is has turned out to be.”

“And they thought that this was a good time to go and fill those strategic areas, which are still lying without any American presence. And, of course, to control the energy tap of the world.”

“Presently, it is the Middle East, and in future it is going to be Central Asia,” added Gul.

Gul told Zakaria that the evidence for 9/11 being planned by Osama Bin Laden and executed by Al-Qaeda has not emerged and that the events are still “shrouded in mystery”.

“A lot of people have a lot of misgivings about that. And it’s not only me. I think a lot of people in America would be thinking the same way. There are scientists, there are scholars, who have written articles on it,” added Gul, calling for President elect Barack Obama to set up a new commission to investigate the attacks.

Gul said the attacks were planned inside America by people with a dangerous agenda who have “turned the world upside-down”.

Returning from a commercial break, Zakaria, editor of Newsweek, Council on Foreign Relations kingpin and also a Trilateral Commission board member, told his viewers, “Some of General Gul’s views are simply false. There is a mountain of evidence about 9/11 that refutes his assertions,” but Zakaria failed to cite any of it.

Zakaria was then joined by counter-insurgency expert David Kilcullen who said that the Mumbai attacks bore all the hallmarks of a “clandestine operation or a covert operation style activity,” but when pressed he refused to directly implicate Pakistan in the attack.


Filibuster Al Qaeda Founder Robert Gates

Posted in News, Truth/Freedom on December 9, 2008 by truthwillrise

Filibuster Al Qaeda Founder Robert Gates


Webster Griffin Tarpley
December 8, 2008

Robert Gates
Gates is a secret government toady, not the autonomous figure of integrity required to terminate US involvement in Bush’s catstrophic Iraq adventure.  

The nomination of Robert Gates to be Secretary of Defense must be rejected. Gates is deeply implicated in three decades of crimes by the intelligence community. There is no reason to think he intends to begin the necessary rapid departure of US forces from Iraq. His nomination by Bush can only be read as a deliberate provocation directed against the new Democratic Congress. Will the Democrats fight back, or will they capitulate? The American people are watching the Democratic Senators carefully, and they are appalled by the self-congratulatory and clubby narcissism of the Senate at a time when US forces are facing encirclement and decimation in Iraq and Afghanistan. . Senators must not only vote against Gates; they must stop the confirmation process with a filibuster. A look at Gates’ sordid record shows why.

Robert Gates was an integral part of the gun-running, drug-running, and death squad murders lumped under the heading of the Iran-Contra scandal. Gates started in Iran-contra as a stooge of William Casey, and continued under Bush the elder.

When Gates was nominated by Reagan to be head of the CIA in 1987, his role in Iran-contra crimes was already so filthy and so blatant that he was forced to drop out of contention under questioning. In doing this, Gates was seeking to defend his new master, George H.W. Bush, who at that time was preparing a presidential bid for 1988. The elder Bush was the czar of all Reagan-Bush covert operations, including Iran-contra. Gates fell on his sword to avoid revelations which would have doomed the candidacy of Bush the elder. Payback for Gates came in June 1991, when he was nominated once again to be head of the CIA, this time by Bush the elder. Sam Nunn and some others posed embarrassing questions, but this time the cover-up of Gates’ Iran-contra role was supervised by Sen. David Boren of the Bush Skull & Bones clique. The Democrats, intimated by the elder Bush’s apparent victory in the first Gulf war, rolled over. If Gates was too dirty to even get to a vote in committee in 1987, how can he be acceptable today? If Democratic Senators like Levin and Biden opposed Gates in 1991, how can they find him acceptable for a much more important post at a time of far greater crisis?

Gates’ resume is marked by a total absence of independent and competent judgment. His pedigree is rather that of a stooge who serves powerful masters. The first was Reagan’s CIA Director William Casey, the kingpin of Iran-contra. The second was George H.W. Bush, who took over that role from Casey. Gates appears as a Bush family retainer, as when he was tapped by the family in 1999 to become Dean of the George Bush School of Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University. Gates is a secret government toady, not the autonomous figure of integrity required to terminate US involvement in Bush’s catstrophic Iraq adventure.

  • A d v e r t i s e m e n t

The Bush regime has become infamous for fixing the facts and the intelligence to suit the pre-determined policy of aggression and adventurism. As Pentagon chief, Gates would control the majority of the US intelligence budget. His track record promises nothing but more faked intelligence. In September 1991, Time Magazine cited widespread reports that Gates “cooked the books” while he was at the CIA to support the political demands of the Reagan and Bush regimes. A New York Times editorial of November 4, 1991 concluded that “charges that Mr. Gates slanted intelligence assessments, leaving Congress in the dark and more amenable to administration policy, stand unrefuted.” George Shultz reports in his memoirs that he “felt that Gates was giving me an idealized picture of what was an altogether different reality,” and complained to Gates on January 5, 1987, “I don’t have any confidence in the intelligence community I feel you try to manipulate me. So you have a very dissatisfied customer. If this were a business, I’d find myself another supplier.” The Senate would be well advised to find itself another supplier today. Will Gates resist the new attacks on Iran, Syria. North Korea, demanded by Cheney and the neocons? His assurances in this regard are worthless.

In the final report of the Independent Counsel for Iran/Contra Matters, Lawrence Walsh left little doubt that he believed Gates had given perjured testimony during that investigation. But Walsh concluded that the matters involved were so complicated that it would be very difficult to prove them before a jury. For this reason and for no other, Gates did not face criminal charges for perjury.

Most damning of all is the fact that Gates was one of the founders of al Qaeda, the CIA’s Arab Legion which was assembled to attack the Soviets in Afghanistan. Gates is thus part of the infrastructure that produced the patsies of 9/11:

According to former CIA Director Robert Gates’s memoir From the Shadows, the big expansion of the US covert operation in Afghanistan began in 1984. During this year, “the size of the CIA’s covert program to help the Mujaheddin increased several times over,” reaching a level of about $500 million in US and Saudi payments funneled through the Zia regime in Pakistan. As Gates recalled, “it was during this period [1985] that we began to learn of a significant increase in the number of Arab nationals from other countries who had traveled to Afghanistan to fight in the Holy War against the Soviets. They came from Syria, Iraq, Algeria, and elsewhere, and most fought with the Islamic fundamentalist Muj groups, particularly that headed by Abdul Resaul Sayyaf. We examined ways to increase their participation, perhaps in the form of some sort of ‘international brigade,’ but nothing came of it. Years later, these fundamentalist fighters trained by the Mujaheddin in Afghanistan would begin to show up around the world, from the Middle East to New York City, still fighting their Holy War ­ only now including the United States among their enemies. Our mission was to push the Soviets out of Afghanistan. We expected a post-Soviet Afghanistan to be ugly, but never considered that it would become a haven for terrorists operating worldwide.” (Gates 349) But the international brigade Gates talked about was in fact created ­ as the group now known as al Qaeda. (Tarpley, 9/11 Synthetic Terror, pp.139-140 )

This is the same al Qaeda which provided the troupe of patsies, psychotics, and double agents (bin Laden, Atta, Moussaoui, etc.) which were used to pin the 9/11 attacks on Arabs and Moslems ­ instead of the US bankers’ rogue network which actually carried out 9/11 for geopolitical reasons. Gates is up to his ears in the terror apparatus of this rogue network, the September criminals who created 9/11.

There can be no question of approving such a candidate. Even the Senate’s willingness to hold hearings for so compromised a figure amounts to an obscene farce. In the recent election, Democrats campaigned against the rubber-stamp Republican Congress. These same Democrats dare not rubber stamp the Gates nomination now. In particular, Democratic presidential candidates in the Senate are reminded that if they fail to filibuster Gates, the aroused anti-war base of the Democratic Party will demand accountability on the campaign trail. We do not want bi-partisan sellouts, but rather a real opposition to the Bush regime and its crimes. Above all, we want 9/11 truth as the essential precondition for restoring lawful government.


Posted in Truth/Freedom on December 9, 2008 by truthwillrise


America’s Rogue Usurper-In-Chief

By Lynn Stuter

December 9, 2008

Over the past several days a number of people have sent me e-mails listing out all the records that should exist on Barack Hussein Obama. It’s a laundry list, chief among those records are his vault copy birth certificate — that would show where he was born; his school records — showing whether he applied for aid as a foreign student; and his passports — which would show in what countries Obama has claimed citizenship. Of the records that have been obtained, the Certification of Live Birth produced by Obama has been proven a forgery (Note: the link to has been removed; the site has either been hacked or removed from the internet); his selective service registration has also been proven a forgery, and the school registration from Fransiskus Assisi School in Jakarta, Indonesia has been proven authentic but proves that Obama’s name was changed to Barry Soetoro when adopted by his mother’s second husband, and that he was a citizen of Indonesia when he was enrolled in the Fransiskus Assisi School.

Do Barack Hussein Obama’s college records show that he applied for aid as a foreign student? Does his actual vault copy Hawaii birth certificate show that he was born in Kenya? Was the passport on which Obama traveled in 1981 when he visited Pakistan issued by Indonesia?

These are questions Americans want answered and have every right to have answered. They are questions, however, that Obama refuses to answer.

For a man who ran his campaign on a pledge of openness and transparency, Obama is overly reticent when it comes to records which he should, as a servant of the people, gladly provide for public viewing. So reticent is Obama, in fact, that he has spent over a half million dollars trying to get out of producing a document that would cost him $12.00 to have reproduced, and that would answer a question that every American should be asking: is Obama a natural born citizen as required by Article II, Section I of the U.S. Constitution in order to be eligible to the office of president. That Obama has hired not one but three law firms trying to keep from producing a $12.00 document makes his reasons for doing so highly suspect.

If he passes the hurdle of where he was born, then he must clear the hurdles of Indonesian citizenship, his various and sundry aliases, and what country issued the passport in 1981 that he used when he visited Indonesia then Pakistan, a country in turmoil

So much for that overblown claim of being a “man of the people.” He’s about as much a man of the people as was William Jefferson Clinton whose close circle of “friends” seemed to end up with “Arkansas flu” on a regular enough basis that those who remained knew their continued existence depended on whether they kept their mouths shut about the Clintons’ illicit affairs, of every variety. And the people victimized by the Clintons’ penchant for extramarital affairs also learned to keep their mouths shut lest they end up like Vince Foster, the victim of one of those bizarre suicides that seemed to plague people who crossed the Clintons. Speaking of the Clintons, how ironic that Obama has chosen his arch-rival for the Democrat Party nomination, Senator Hillary Clinton, to be his Secretary of State in violation of Article I, Section 6, United States Constitution:

No Senator or Representative shall, during the time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office under the authority of the United States, which shall have been created, or the emoluments whereof shall have been increased during such time: and no person holding any office under the United States, shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office.

While the Senate and House have carefully avoided the subject of Obama’s eligibility to the office of president (even Representative Ron Paul), Senator Byrd of West Virginia was quick to question the constitutionality of the Clinton nomination. CNN and Fox News even jumped on the band wagon. If the Senate and House have no authority to address the eligibility of the president under the United States Constitution, then the Senate and House do not have the authority to, in any way, question whether Clinton’s appointment as Secretary of State violates the Constitution. To do so is to selectively enforce the provisions of the Constitution. Under the rule of law, they address both or they address neither.

And true to form, the mainstream media has, for the most part, remained silent about the growing controversy over Barack Hussein Obama’s zeal to keep his vault copy Hawaii birth certificate from being examined. Those news outlets that have addressed it have done so with short articles erroneously claiming that what Obama produced in June of this year was his “birth certificate.” Nothing could be further from the truth. One such article appeared on December 4, 2008, in the Honolulu Advertiser. This is one of the newspapers that printed the Obama birth announcement, devoid of the name of the hospital, back in 1961. The article, like so many fluff pieces put out by the mainstream media, took a little truth, a big lie, wrapped them up together, and spit them out as “the truth”. The article claims that,

During the presidential campaign, the Obama camp posted a copy of his Honolulu birth certificate on its Web site. That copy indicates he was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961.

It is true that Obama posted a document on his website that indicates he was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961; but that “document” was not a birth certificate; it was a Certification of Live Birth which proves nothing about where he was actually born. Under Hawaiian law, Obama could have been born in Kenya and his birth still registered in Hawaii even though he was not a natural born citizen by birth, not an American citizen at all. The Certification of Live Birth does not provide that information.

The Honolulu Advertiser is situated in Honolulu, Hawaii. Can we assume, then, that those employed by the Honolulu Advertiser in the great state of Hawaii don’t know the difference between a birth certificate and a Certification of Live Birth as issued by the State of Hawaii? Did the individual who wrote this fluff piece really not know that the two documents are not the same, or was he/she deliberately misstating the case? My e-mail to the Honolulu Advertiser asking the obvious questions remains unanswered; probably answer enough.

Another such article was written by Tom Ramstack of the Washington Times. In that article Ramstack claims,

Mr. Obama demonstrated his citizenship during his campaign by circulating copies of his birth certificate, which showed he was born in Hawaii on Aug. 4, 1961.

My e-mail to Mr Ramstack, pointing out the error in his piece, also remains unanswered; again, answer enough.

That mainstream media cannot get something as simple as the difference between two distinctly dissimilar documents straight makes one wonder just how much they do report accurately; and how much they deliberately report as the truth that isn’t.

And not to be ignored is the blog of David Horowitz of FrontPage Magazine in which he admonishes those asking if Obama is eligible to the office of president to “get over it.” Get over what, Mr Horowitz? The fact that our constitution is in jeopardy? Do you really think that constitutes “right-wing trash talk”? Get over it? Not on your life, Mr Horowitz. Shame on you for even daring to suggest such a thing. If you are the same David Horowitz who wrote Radical Son and Hating Whitey, either I missed something in reading those books or you should know better than most that our Constitution remains intact only so long as we, the people, remain eternally vigilant. That you seem to think 64,000,000 votes for Obama — approximately 29.6% of the total voting-age populace — trumps the U.S. Constitution is unbelievable! That you think “what the people say, goes” is preposterous. That isn’t rule by law, that’s rule by the majority with the rights of the minority at the whim of the majority; that’s rule by man according to his own passions, opinions and prejudices; that’s democracy; that’s mobocracy! In case you aren’t aware, we are not a democracy, for all the mainstream media’s calling us that, for all George Bush’s erroneous contentions that we are; we are a republic with a republican form of government as guaranteed by Article IV, Section 4 of the United States Constitution. That you think we will disenfranchise 64 million voters if Obama is found ineligible is no reason to not press the issue. It is far better that 64 million voters be disenfranchised than for 306,000,000 Americans to wake up tomorrow to no Constitution whatever! The simple fact is that you ignore the Constitution at your own peril.

And not to be ignored are all the pro-Obama court jesters who carefully skirt the real issues concerning Obama’s eligibility to the office of president and launch into smear campaigns that are supposed to pass as journalistic endeavor against those who dare ask the hard questions, working diligently to paint them as some whacked out conspiracy theorists who “refuse to see the truth” and shouldn’t be believed. Their idea of “truth,” however, leaves much to be desired. And when their voices become shrill, as they have, you know you are way too close to the truth. These court jesters can’t bear the thought that their “messiah” might end up as the emperor with no clothes.

It has been suggested, in more than one venue, that the choosing of Obama, a man who at least looks black, to run for president at this time, knowing full well that the question of his eligibility would arise, is no coincidence, is no mistake; that it was and is a very calculated and deliberate move to see how the American people would respond, just as Waco and Ruby Ridge were very calculated and deliberate moves to see if the American people would tolerate an attack on their rights under the color of quashing religious fanaticism.

Time after time, the global one-world government agenda has had to be pushed back because of resistance from the American people. Being unable to complete the concept of transformational Marxism via gradualism or the “quiet revolution” according to the wanted timeline, violent means becomes the avenue of change. What better way to do that then to pit those who erroneously believe Obama will give to them what they haven’t earned against those who believe in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. And when armed conflict ensues, one side against the other, does it not serve the purpose of the puppet master who can then seize power in a coup, immediately dispensing with the Constitution and the rights inherent therein under the color of martial law?

On Friday, the United States Supreme Court met in conference to consider Donofrio vs Wells. Their decision, obviously made on Friday, was not, however, made public until today. And obviously, the delay in announcing that decision was to give the government the time needed to respond to any violence that might erupt when the decision of the court was made public.

On Friday, the United States Supreme Court sidestepped its responsibility to the American people. In so doing, the United States Supreme Court made it very clear that it is the agent of the puppet master that calls the shots in Washington, DC; the shadow government so many want to deny the existence of but that too many Americans are now aware of to give any credence to any attempt at denial.

The United States Supreme Court has made it clear that it will bless the presidency of a man who, by all appearances and by his failure to produce the most basic of documents proving his right to run for the highest office in the United States, is not eligible to the office of president. If Obama truly loved this country as he claims, he would have produced the evidence of his eligibility to the office of president long ago. That he has not makes it very apparent that he is not eligible and is a usurper, plain and simple.

In its failure to act on behalf the citizens of the United States, the United States Supreme Court has made it very clear that it is no longer an agent of justice as required by our constitution; that it is nothing more than the legal arm of the puppet master, forcing upon the American people the tyranny of the communist/fascist agenda. Obama is the bastard child of the same puppet master. Lawsuits challenging the eligibility of Obama to the office of president have been filed in at least 28 states. Those lawsuits will meet the same fate of indifference as has Donofrio vs Wells and Berg vs Obama. And they will meet the same fate because the United States Supreme Court, to a justice, has made it clear they are the whores of the puppet master.

Those who believe in the one document that has made our country the great nation that it is, will either acquiesce or fight. Today we either stand for the Constitution and Bill of Rights or America ceases to exist.

Further reading:

1 – Why the POTUS Needs to be a Natural-Born Citizen
2 – Update: Obama’s Birth Status
3 – Weatherman terrorists: Obama’s centrism a ‘smokescreen’
4 – That Bleeping Birth Certificate
5 – Supreme Court to Uphold or Ignore the Constitution?
6 – President-elect Obama: It’s Time To Come Clean On Your Birth Certificate
7 – Obama: The Trojan Horse

© 2008 Lynn M. Stuter – All Rights Reserved